<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Journal>
<Journal-Info>
<name>International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences</name>
<website>ijpbs.net</website>
<email>editorijpbs@rediffmail.com (or) editorofijpbs@yahoo.com (or) prasmol@rediffmail.com</email>
</Journal-Info>
<article>
<article-id pub-id-type='other'>10.22376/ijpbs.2019.10.1.p1-12</article-id>
<issue_number>Volume 5 Issue 4</issue_number>
<issue_period>2014 (October - December)</issue_period>
<title>ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERN OF SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROVAR TYPHI AND PARATYPHI A FROM NORTH INDIA: THE CHANGING SCENARIO </title>
<abstract>Enteric fever prevails as a major public health problem despite the use of antimicrobials due to the emergence of drug resistance. The present study was undertaken to find out the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of  lessThan i greaterThan Salmonella  lessThan /i greaterThan isolates from our region. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for six drugs chloramphenicol (30µg), amoxicillin (10µg), cotrimoxazole (1.25/23.75µg), nalidixic acid (30µg), ciprofloxacin (5µg), and ceftriaxone (30µg) was done by the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. E-test was performed to calculate the MIC of ciprofloxacin. A total of the 80  lessThan i greaterThan Salmonella lessThan /i greaterThan  species was isolated which comprised of 51 (63.8%)  lessThan i greaterThan Salmonella enterica lessThan /i greaterThan  serovar Typhi and 29 (36.2%)  lessThan i greaterThan Salmonella enterica lessThan /i greaterThan  serovar Paratyphi A lessThan i greaterThan .  lessThan /i greaterThan All the isolates were nearly susceptible to the first line drugs, and none was multi drug resistant.Nalidixic acid resistance was high being 96% in  lessThan i greaterThan Salmonella typhi  lessThan /i greaterThan and 100% in  lessThan i greaterThan Salmonella paratyphi lessThan /i greaterThan  A. In  lessThan i greaterThan Salmonella typhi  lessThan /i greaterThan  17.6% isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin by the disc diffusion technique whereas 47% were resistant by the E-test. Similarly in  lessThan i greaterThan  Salmonella paratyphi lessThan /i greaterThan  A 48.3% were detected resistant by the E- test. Reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin indicating higher MIC to ciprofloxacin was seen in 49 % isolates of  lessThan i greaterThan Salmonella typhi lessThan /i greaterThan  and 51.7% in the other serotype. These isolates are undetected by the routine disc diffusion techniques and result in treatment failure cases. It is pertinent to mention that MIC of ciprofloxacin by the E-test is more beneficial to assess the true pattern of resistance.</abstract>
<authors>SURUCHI BHAGRA , ANIL KANGA , SUNITE A GANJU  AND ATAL SOOD</authors>
<keywords>Multidrug resistance, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone</keywords>
<pages>01-09</pages>
</article>
</Journal>
