<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Journal>
<Journal-Info>
<name>International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences</name>
<website>ijpbs.net</website>
<email>editorijpbs@rediffmail.com (or) editorofijpbs@yahoo.com (or) prasmol@rediffmail.com</email>
</Journal-Info>
<article>
<article-id pub-id-type='other'>10.22376/ijpbs.2019.10.1.p1-12</article-id>
<issue_number>Volume 4 Issue 2</issue_number>
<issue_period>2013 (April - June)</issue_period>
<title>TOPOGRAPHIC IMAGING OF MYCOBACTERIUM SMEGMATIS CELLS SURFACE TREATED WITH ETHAMBUTOL AND RIFAMPICIN </title>
<abstract>The mycobacterial cells were treated with 0.96 mg/ml of Ethambutol (EMB) and 0.64 mg/ml of Rifampicin (RIF) in Luria Bertani (LB) broth. The native and treated cells were serially diluted (10 lessThan sup greaterThan -1  lessThan /sup greaterThan to 10 lessThan sup greaterThan -30 lessThan /sup greaterThan ), from the 10 lessThan sup greaterThan -25 lessThan /sup greaterThan  dilution native cells and antibiotics treated cells were imaged using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). The normal surface roughness (R lessThan sub greaterThan rms lessThan /sub greaterThan ) of the native cells was 0.353 nm, whereas the surface roughness for EMB treated cells was 3.14 nm. The RIF treated cells pores (width size: 19.86 nm) were created on the surface of the cell membrane. This paper provides a new finding on EMB was alone creates the roughness on the cell wall surface of  lessThan i greaterThan Mycobacterium smegmatis lessThan /i greaterThan . Interestingly we got the better image of after treatment of RIF was creates pores on the cell wall surface of  lessThan i greaterThan M. smegmatis. lessThan /i greaterThan </abstract>
<authors>P. SANKAR GANESH , K. KANIVALAN, K. RAJENDRAN,D.KUMAR AND S. KUMARAN</authors>
<keywords>Mycobacterium smegmatis, Ethambutol, Rifampicin, Roughness, Pores</keywords>
<pages>255-262</pages>
</article>
</Journal>
